Document Type : Research Paper


1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business ‎and Economics, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

2 Ph.D., Human Resource Management, Lecturer, Department of Management ‎and Accounting, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran ‎

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and ‎Economics, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran



Due to the increasing demand for environmental protection from ‎various stakeholders; adopting a green technological solution tailored to ‎the operational characteristics of each organization is a fundamental ‎task for achieving sustainable organizations. Therefore, the purpose of ‎this study is to identify and analyze the barriers to the adoption of green ‎technology in the electricity industry. The present study in method is ‎quantitative; it has an applied orientation and survey strategy. The ‎statistical population of the study is the employees of Zanjan Power ‎Distribution Company. In the first step of the research, to identify ‎barriers and effective indicators in order to accept green technology, the ‎research literature was reviewed and a focus group was held. In the ‎second step of the research, fuzzy hierarchical analysis technique was ‎used to rank the identified factors and indicators. The data collection ‎tool is a researcher-made questionnaire. In order to assess the validity of ‎the questionnaire, face and content validity were used. Also, to measure ‎the reliability, the incompatibility rate coefficient of triangular fuzzy ‎pairwise comparison matrices was used, and considering that this value ‎is less than ‎‏0.1‏‎; the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed. The ‎results indicate that the most important barriers to the adoption of green ‎technology in order of priority are: process barriers, individual barriers, ‎social barriers, cultural barriers and customer barriers. Also, the index of ‎‎"lack of attention to environmental issues by government officials" ‎related to the factor of "social barriers" received the highest score ‎among the indicators.‎


  • رجب پور، ابراهیم؛ "مدیریت منابع انسانی سبز و رفتار سازگار با محیط‌‌زیست کارکنان با ‏تأکید بر نقش سرمایۀ اجتماعی"، مدیریت سرمایه ‏اجتماعی، دوره 7، شماره 3، صص 371-345، 1399.‏
  • رضائی سامان کندی، مسعود؛ شادنوش، نصرت الله؛ سهرابی، طهمورث؛ "چارچوب ‏سیاستگذاری فناوری براساس ارزش‌های اخلاقی و ‏اجتماعی: مطالعه موردی فناوری نانو ‏در صنعت برق و انرژی"، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های سیاستگذاری و برنامه‌ریزی انرژی، دوره ۶، شماره 4، صص 166-125، 1400.
  • فالیان، الهام؛ نظری، فریبا؛ "شناسایی و تحلیل روابط متقابل میان شاخص‌های موانع پذیرش ‏فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات با رویکرد دلفی ‏فازی و دیمتل فازی"، ماهنامه علمی اکتشاف ‏و تولید نفت و گاز، شماره 184، صص 49-38، 1399.
  • Abdullah, L.; Zulkifli, N.; “Integration of fuzzy AHP and ‎interval type-‎2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application ‎to human ‎resource management”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, Issue 9, pp. 4397-4409‏‎, 2015.
  • Aguilera-Caracuel, J.; Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N.; “Green ‎innovation and financial performance: An ‎institutional approach”, ‎Organization & Environment, Vol. 26, Issue 4, pp. 365-385‏‎, 2013.‎
  • Arora, S.; Saraswat, S.; “Vermifiltration as a natural, ‎sustainable and green technology for environmental ‎remediation: ‎A new paradigm for wastewater treatment process”, Current ‎Research in Green and Sustainable ‎Chemistry, Vol. 4, 100061, 2021.
  • Braun, E.; Wield, D.; “Regulation as a means for the social ‎control of technology”, Technology Analysis & ‎Strategic ‎Management, Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 259-272‏‎, 1994.‎
  • Deng, Y.; You, D.; Wang, J.; “Optimal strategy for ‎enterprises’ green technology innovation from the ‎perspective of ‎political competition”, Journal of Cleaner Production, issue 235‎, pp. 930-942‏‎, 2019.‎
  • Den Hertog, P.; Van der AA, W.; De Jong, M. W.; “‎Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards ‎a ‎conceptual framework”, Journal of service Management, Vol. 21, Issue 4, pp. 490-514, 2010.‎
  • Desheng, L.; Jiakui, C.; Ning, Z.; “Political Connections and ‎Green Technology Innovations under an ‎Environmental ‎Regulation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 126778‏‎, 2021.
  • El-Kassar, A. N.; Singh, S. K.; “Green innovation and ‎organizational performance: the influence of big data ‎and the ‎moderating role of management commitment and HR practices”, ‎Technological Forecasting and Social ‎Change, Issue 144, pp. 483-498, 2019.
  • Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Liang, Z.; “How does environmental ‎information disclosure affect economic ‎development and haze ‎pollution in Chinese cities? The mediating role of green ‎technology innovation”, Science ‎of the Total Environment, Issue 775, 145811, 2021.
  • Fernando, Y.; Jabbour, C. J. C.; Wah, W. X.; “Pursuing green ‎growth in technology firms through the ‎connections between ‎environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: ‎does service capability ‎matter?”, Resources, Conservation and ‎Recycling, Vol. 141, pp. 8-20, 2019.
  • Fujii, H.; Managi, S.; “Decomposition analysis of sustainable ‎green technology inventions in China”, ‎Technological Forecasting ‎and Social Change, ‎‏Issue 139‏‎, pp. 10-16‏‎, 2019.
  • Govindan, K.; Shankar, K. M.; Kannan, D.; “Application of ‎fuzzy analytic network process for barrier ‎evaluation in ‎automotive parts remanufacturing towards cleaner production–a ‎study in an Indian scenario”, ‎Journal of Cleaner Production, Issue 114, pp. 199-213, 2016.
  • Ghisetti, C.; Quatraro, F.; “Green technologies and ‎environmental productivity: a cross-sectoral analysis of ‎direct and ‎indirect effects in Italian regions”, Ecological Economics, Issue 132, pp. 1-13, 2017.‎
  • Hagspiel, V.; Huisman, K. J.; Nunes, C.; “Optimal technology ‎adoption when the arrival rate of new ‎technologies changes”, ‎European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 243, Issue 3, pp. 897-911, 2015.
  • Hashmi, R.; Alam, K.; “Dynamic relationship among ‎environmental regulation, innovation, CO‏2‏ emissions, ‎population, ‎and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation”, ‎Journal of cleaner ‎production, Issue 231, pp. 1100-1109, 2019.
  • Hermann, R. R.; Mosgaard, M.; Kerndrup, S.; The function ‎of intermediaries in collaborative innovation ‎processes: retrofitting ‎a Danish small island ferry with green technology”, International ‎Journal of Innovation ‎and Sustainable Development, Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 361-383, 2016.
  • Jiao, J.; Chen, C.; Bai, Y.; “Is green technology vertical ‎spillovers more significant in mitigating carbon ‎intensity? ‎Evidence from Chinese industries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Issue 257, 120354, 2020.
  • Li, L.; “China's manufacturing locus in ‎‏2025‏: With a comparison ‎of “Made-in-China ‎2025 and ‘Industry ‎4/0’”, ‎Technological ‎Forecasting and Social Change, Issue 135, pp. 66-74, 2018.
  • Li, X.; Du, J.; Long, H.; “Dynamic analysis of international ‎green behavior from the perspective of the ‎mapping knowledge ‎domain”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 26, Issue 6, pp. 6087-6098‏‎, 2019.
  • Li, D.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X., ; Cao, C.; “Impact of ‎quality management on green innovation”, Journal ‎of Cleaner ‎Production, Issue 170, pp. 462-470, 2018.
  • Ma, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Q.; “Top management team ‎faultlines, green technology innovation and firm ‎financial ‎performance”, Journal of Environmental Management, Issue 285, 112095, 2021.
  • Neto, G. C. O.; Leite, R. R.; Shibao, F. Y.; Lucato, W. C.; “Framework to overcome barriers in the ‎implementation of cleaner ‎production in small and medium-sized enterprises: Multiple case ‎studies in Brazil”, ‎Journal of Cleaner Production, Issue 142, pp. 50-62, 2017.
  • Paramati, S. R.; Mo, D.; Huang, R.; “The role of financial ‎deepening and green technology on carbon ‎emissions: evidence ‎from major OECD economies”, Finance Research Letters, 101794‎, 2020.‎
  • Peng, X.; Liu, Y.; “Behind eco-innovation: Managerial ‎environmental awareness and external resource ‎acquisition”, ‎Journal of cleaner production, Issue 139, pp. 347-360, 2016.
  • Quatraro, F.; Scandura, A.; “Academic inventors and the ‎antecedents of green technologies. A regional ‎analysis of Italian ‎patent data”, Ecological Economics, Issue 156, pp. 247-263, 2019.
  • Tan, R. R.; Aviso, K. B.; Ng, D. K. S.; “Optimization models ‎for financing innovations in green energy ‎technologies”, Renewable ‎and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Issue 113, 109258, 2019.
  • Tooranloo, H. S.; Azadi, M. H.; Sayyahpoor, A.; “Analyzing ‎factors affecting implementation success of ‎sustainable human ‎resource management (SHRM) using a hybrid approach of FAHP ‎and Type-‎2 fuzzy ‎DEMATEL”, Journal of cleaner production, ‎‏Issue 162, pp. 1252-1265, 2017.‎
  • Trapp, C. T.; Kanbach, D. K.; “Green entrepreneurship and ‎business models: Deriving green technology ‎business model ‎archetypes”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 126694, 2021.‎
  • Xia, D.; Zhang, M.; Yu, Q.; Tu, Y.; “Developing a framework ‎to identify barriers of Green technology ‎adoption for enterprises”, ‎Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Issue 143‏‎, pp. 99-110, 2019.
  • Yan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Pei, L. L.; “The impact of risk-taking ‎level on green technology innovation: Evidence ‎from energy-‎intensive listed companies in China”, Journal of Cleaner ‎Production, Issue 281, 124685, 2021.
  • Yu, X.; Lan, Y.; Zhao, R.; “Strategic green technology ‎innovation in a two-stage alliance: vertical ‎collaboration or co-‎development?”, Omega, Issue 98, 102116, 2021.
  • Yuan, B.; Xiang, Q.; “Environmental regulation, industrial ‎innovation and green development of Chinese ‎manufacturing: ‎Based on an extended CDM model”, Journal of cleaner ‎production, Issue 176, pp. 895-908, 2018.‎
  • Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xue, Y.; Yang, J.; “Impact of ‎environmental regulations on green technological ‎innovative ‎behavior: An empirical study in China”, Journal of Cleaner ‎Production, Issue 188, pp. 763-773‏‎, 2018.‎
  • Zhang, J.; Ouyang, Y.; Ballesteros-Pérez, P.; Li, H.; Philbin, S. P.; Li, ‎; Skitmore, M.; “Understanding the ‎impact of ‎environmental regulations on green technology innovation ‎efficiency in the construction industry”, ‎Sustainable Cities and ‎Society, Issue 65, 102647, 2021.