فصلنامه توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی

بررسی سطوح پیچیدگی فناورانه‌ی فعالیت‌های تحقیق و توسعه در شرکت-های دانش‌بنیان مستقر در پارک علم و فناوری گلستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

غلامعلی شهمرادی 1
تقی ترابی 2
رضا رادفر 3
محمدحسن چراغعلی 4

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت تکنولوژی، گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد واحد علوم و تحقیقات

3 مدیر گروه تخصصی مدیریت صنعتی ، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد علوم و تحقیقات

4 استادیار گروه مدیریت واحد تهران جنوب

https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2024.711435
چکیده
امروزه فعالیت‌های تحقیق و توسعه، از منابع مهم ایجاد تحوّل در حوزه‌های تکنولوژی و تولید دانش محسوب می‌شوند و بخش‌های تحقیق و توسعه‌ی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان نقش مهمی در نوآوری و بهبود محصولات و خدمات دارند. هر چه سطح فعالیت‌های تحقیقاتی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان پیشرفته‌تر و بنیادی‌تر باشد و میزان پیچیدگی فناورانه‌ی این فعالیت‌ها بالاتر باشد، امکان عرضه محصولات نوآورانه تر و قابل رقابت‌تر به بازارهای داخلی و جهانی فراهم می‌گردد. در این راستا پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی سطوح پیچیدگی فناورانه‌ی فعالیت‌های تحقیق و توسعه در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان انجام شد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، پژوهشی کاربردی- توسعه ای بوده و از نظر ماهیت و روش، توصیفی- تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیه مدیران عامل شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان مستقر در پارک علم و فناوری گلستان به تعداد 85 نفر بودند. حجم نمونه‌ها با استفاده از جدول مورگان و با لحاظ احتیاط بیشتر، 80 نفر درنظر گرفته شد و از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس استفاده شد. ابزار مورد استفاده برای جمع‌آوری داده‌های پژوهش، پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته است که روایی آن با سنجش روایی صوری و محتوایی و پایایی آن با استفاده از روش آلفای کرونباخ تأیید شد. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که 65 درصد از فعالیت‌های تحقیق و توسعه در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان مستقر در پارک علم و فناوری گلستان، از نوع توسعه‌ تجربی، 2/31 درصد از نوع تحقیق کاربردی و تنها 8/3 درصد از نوع تحقیق بنیادی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پیچیدگی فناورانه
تحقیق و توسعه
شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the levels of technological complexity of research and development activities in knowledge-based companies located in Golestan Science and Technology Park

نویسندگان English

gholamali shahmoradi 1
taghi torabi 2
reza radfar 3
mohammadhasan cheraghali 4
1 Ph. D. student in Technology Management, Department of Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Science and Research Unit
3 Professor, Department of Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant professor of management department of south Tehran branch
چکیده English

Today, research and development activities are considered important sources of transformation in the fields of technology and knowledge production, and research and development departments of knowledge-based companies play an important role in innovation and improvement of products and services. The more advanced and fundamental the level of research activities of knowledge-based companies and the higher the level of technological complexity of these activities, the more innovative and competitive products are available to the domestic and global markets. turns In this regard, the present research was conducted with the aim of investigating the levels of technological complexity of research and development activities in knowledge-based companies. This research is an applied-developmental research in terms of its purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of its nature and method. The statistical population of the research was all CEOs of knowledge-based companies located in Golestan Science and Technology Park, numbering 85 people. The sample size was considered to be 80 people using Morgan's table and more cautiously, and available sampling method was used. The tool used to collect research data is a researcher-made questionnaire, whose validity was confirmed by measuring face and content validity and its reliability using Cronbach's alpha method. The results of the research indicate that 65% of research and development activities in knowledge-based companies based in Golestan Science and Technology Park are experimental development, 31.2% are applied research and only 3.8%. The percentage is the type of basic research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

technological complexity
research and development
knowledge-based companies
  • Abdullahi Khoshmardan, S., Manteghi, M., Khamsa, A. (2020); "Presenting a model to identify the complexity dimensions of technological superprojects with metacombination method", Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 5(3).
  • Ahmadian Devokti, M. M., Aghajani, H. A., Shirkhodai, M., Tehranchian, A. (2017); "Economic complexity, a new approach to measure the commercialization of scientific and technological products", Library and Information, 21(4), pp. 161-124.
  • Amiri, S., Rezaei, B. (2022); "Effective factors on technology commercialization in knowledge-based companies (case study: Kermanshah province)", Karafan Scientific Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 337-362.
  • Amsden, H., Ted Tschang, F. (2003); "A new approach to assessing the technological complexity of different categories of R&D (with examples from Singapore)", Research Policy, 32 (2003), pp. 553–572.
  • Armaghan, N., Qaedsharafi, H., Agha Beigi, S. (2022); "The role of open innovation in the technology development of knowledge-based companies, case study: Iran Scientific and Industrial Research Organization's Growth Center", Technology Development Management Quarterly, 10(1), pp. 37-60.
  • Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., Sampat, B. N. (2019); "Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: evidence from NIH funding rules", The Review of economic studies, 86(1), pp. 117-152.
  • Babkin, A. V., Lipatnikov, V. S., Muraveva, S. V. (2015); "Assessing the impact of innovation strategies and R&D costs on the performance of IT companies", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20)7(, pp. 749-758.
  • Bach, M. (2016); "Technology Acceptance Model for Business Intelligence Systems: Preliminary Research", Procedia Computer Science, 100(2), pp. 995-1003.
  • Broekel, T. (2018); Measuring technological complexity – current approaches and a new measure of structural complexity, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1708.07357.
  • Chen, C. P., Hu, J. L., Yang, C. H., et al. (2011); "Aninternational comparison of R&D efficiency of multiple innovative outputs: the role of the national innovation system", Innovation, 13(3), pp. 341–360.
  • Dehkordi Mobini, A., MohammadKazemi, R., Baghestani, B. (2017); IT-enabled value co-creation process for product design, Conference: Internet of Things Business Models, Users, and Networks, pp. 1-8, Publisher: IEEE.
  • Keshavarz, S., Yaqoubi, N. M., Deghati, A. (2021); "Evaluation of the success factors of knowledge-based companies of Fars Science and Technology Park with structural equation modeling approach", Science and Technology Quarterly, 11(1), pp. 35-50.
  • Erasmus, E., Rothmann, S., Van Eeden, C. (2015); "A structural model of technology acceptance", SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 41(1).
  • Ferri, L., Spanò, R., Maffei, M., Fiondella, C. (2021); "Howrisk perception influences CEOs' technological decisions: extending the technology acceptance model to small and medium-sized enterprises technology decision makers", European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), pp. 777-798.
  • Gholizadeh, S., Mohammmadkazemi, R. (2022); "International entrepreneurial opportunity: A systematic review, meta-synthesis, and future research agenda", Journal of International Entrepreneurship.
  • Hashemi, Z. (2019); "Investigation of the behavior of attracting human resources for research and development in knowledge-based companies in response to financial and tax policies: a case study of Iran", Technology Development, 7(3), pp. 124-91.
  • Jamali, B., Mohammmadkazemi, R., Yadollahi farsi, J., Mobini, A. (2018); "Theories of opportunity creation and effective entrepreneurial actions in opportunity creation context", Journal of Decision Science Letters, 7(1), pp. 443 -454.
  • Jarot, S., Astari, R. (2017); Evaluation of knowledge management system using technology acceptancemodel, proceeding of the electrical engineering computer science and informatics, 4(1).
  • Khamsa, A., Farahanifar, F., Forozan Mehr, M. (2020); Technology transfer process management (a comprehensive view on: concepts, process, models, principles, negotiation and contracting, capabilities and technology transfer process management, Karaj: Sarafraz, pp. 27-31.
  • Konjkav Monfared, A. (2020); "Analysis of the impact of technological innovation acceptance factors and resource commitment on knowledge management capabilities in order to increase competitive advantage (research sample: knowledge-based companies in Yazd province)", organizational knowledge management, 3(10), pp. 175-147.
  • Lei, L., Yuchen Y., Yuanchang, W. (2020); "The Impact of R&D Input on Technological Innovation: Evidence from South Asian and Southeast Asian Countries", Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society (DDNS), 2020, Article ID 6408654.
  • Luenendonk, M. (2019); "Research and Development (R&D)", overview and process,

https://www.cleverism.com/rd-research-and-development-overview-process,Last updated on September 18.

  • Mansouri, S., Vazifeh, Z., Yousefi, J. (2017); "Prioritization of drivers of effective factors in the direction of the development of knowledge-based companies in Kerman province", Entrepreneurship Development Scientific Research Quarterly, (36), pp. 319-338.
  • McNerney, J., Doyne Farmer, J., Redner, S., E Trancik, J. (2011); "The role of design complexity in technology improvement", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 108 (22), pp. 9008-9013.
  • Miyazaki, K., Kijima, K. (2000); "complexity in technology management", Technological Forecasting and Social change, 64(1), 39-54.               
  • Mohammadzadeh, Parviz; Sojudi, S., Mehdizadeh, Y. (2013); "Study of factors affecting the research and development activities of Iranian industrial enterprises; application of discrete regression models", Science and Technology Policy Quarterly, 4(4), pp. 6-94.
  • Mohammmadkazemi, R. Nikraftar, H. Yadollahi Farsi, J. Ahmadpour, M. (2019); "The Concept of International Entrepreneurial Orientation in Competitive Firms: A Review & A Research Agenda", International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(3).
  • Molepo, P. M., Marnewick, A., Joseph, N. (2019); "Complexity factors affecting research and development projects duration", 2019 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1-6.
  • Mubarak, M. F., Shaikh, F. A.; Mubarik, M., Samo, K. A.; Mastoi, S. (2019); "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Business Performance, A Study of Pakistani SMEs", Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 9(2).
  • Nafisi, F., MohammadKazemi, R. (2023); "Providing an open innovation model for high-tech startups in the unit of industries related to information technology", International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications.

Doi: 10.22075/ijnaa.2023.29764.4339.

  • Nepelski, D., De Prato, G. (2020); "Technological complexity and economic development", Review of Development Economics. 24(2), pp. 448-470.  
  • (2015); Frascati manual 2015: guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development.
  • Ostadi, B., Sadri, M. (2020); "Identification and prioritization of performance evaluation indicators of knowledge-based companies", Innovation and Value Creation Quarterly, 9(18), pp. 69-80.
  • Pakniat, M., Ansari, R., Shahin, A. (2016); "Analysis of the impact of technological innovation capabilities on technology commercialization and the performance of knowledge-based companies in Isfahan province", Innovation Management, 5(3), pp. 59-84.
  • Qazi Nouri, S. S., Bamdad Sufi, J., Radaei, N. (2016); "Investigating the behavior and performance of Iranian knowledge-based companies with a taxonomy approach", Technology Development Management Quarterly, 4(3), pp. 9-32.
  • Radfar, R., Khamsa, A. (2017); Technology management: a comprehensive view on technology, innovation and commercialization, second edition. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company.
  • Rannikko, H. (2012); Early Development of New Technology-Based Firms, Longitudinal Analysis on New Technology- Based Firms’ Development from Population Level and Firm Level Perspectives, Hanken School of Economics.
  • Shirazi, H., Hashemzadeh Khorasgani, G. R., Radfar, R., Tarabi, T. (2019); "The role of organizational resources and innovation capability in creating competitive advantage of new knowledge-based companies by moderating technology commercialization performance", Innovation Management, 7(4), pp. 115-134.
  • Su, Y., Li, M. (2021); "Applying Technology Acceptance Model in Online", Entrepreneurship Education for New Entrepreneurs, Front, Psychol, 2(9), pp. 34-66.
  • Torabzadeh, M. S., Sajjadieh, A., Hijazi Fard, S. (2018); "Identifying Organizational Factors Affecting Research and Technology Management of Knowledge-Based Organizations in Iran", Public Administration Perspective, 9(35), pp. 56-88.
  • Vaesen, K., Houkes, H. (2017); "complexity and technological evolution: what everybody knows", springer, Biology & Philosophy, 32(3), pp. 1245-1268.
  • Yahyai, ​​M., Hassanzadeh, A. (2018); "Presenting the technology commercialization model in knowledge-based companies in the field of ICT", Investment Knowledg, 7(26), pp. 63-82.
  • Zarei Mahmoudabadi, M., Tahari Mehrjardi, M. H., Mahdovian, A. (2014); "Evaluation of research and development activities in Iran data coverage analysis approach", Industrial Management, 6, pp. 55-74.

  • تاریخ دریافت 19 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 تیر 1402

ارسال مقاله

تماس با ما