مقایسه اثر میانجی‏گری حمایت‌های مالی دولتی و غیردولتی بر عملکرد شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان فاوا

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارآفرینی سازمانی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه تهران

3 هیئت علمی پژوهشکد‌ه فناوری نانو و مواد پیشرفته، استاد مدعو دانشکده کارآفرینی

10.22034/jtd.2025.2013473.1894
چکیده
اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان به‌عنوان موتور توسعه کشورها شناخته می‌شود و به همین دلیل کشورها برای ربودن گوی سبقت در حوزه فناوری‌های پیشرفته سال‌هاست دست به سرمایه‌گذاری در حوزه فناوری‌های پیشرفته و نوآوری‌های نوظهور زده‏اند. ایران نیز چاره برون‌رفت از رکود اقتصادی طولانی‌مدت سال‏های تحریم را توسعه اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان دانسته است. هدف این مقاله، تحلیل و بررسی اثر میانجی‌گری حمایت‌های مالی دولتی و غیردولتی بر عملکرد شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در حوزه فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (فاوا) می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر از نظر داده و روش تحقیق کمی می‌باشد که به صورت طولی انجام شده است. داده‌های لازم برای آزمون 10 فرضیه در این پژوهش از صندوق نوآوری و شکوفایی و معاونت علمی ریاست جمهوری دریافت و مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته است. از نظر قلمرو مکانی، شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان حوزه فاوا در نمونه این پژوهش مورد بررسی قرار گرفته که شامل 1002 شرکت از مجموع 1667 شرکت دانش‌بنیان حوزه فاوا است که از ابتدای قانون حمایت از شرکت‌های دانش بنیان (1389) تا پایان شهریورماه 1401 موفق به اخذ عنوان دانش‌بنیانی روی حداقل یکی از محصولات (کالا یا خدمات) خود شده‌اند. برای آزمون فرضیه‌ها از روش رگرسیون خطی و نرم‌افزار وارپ پی‏ال‏اس نسخه 8 استفاده شده است. نتایج تحلیل نشان می‌دهد باوجود تلاش‌های صورت گرفته در حمایت مالی از شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در تجاری‌سازی و توانمندسازی، این حمایت‌ها تأثیر معنی‌داری بر عملکرد شرکت‌ها نداشته و عملکرد شرکت‌ها اغلب بر اساس نظریه منبع محور به منابع داخلی سازمان همچون منابع مالی و نیروی انسانی شرکت بستگی دارد. لذا این پژوهش فقدان کارایی حمایت‌های مالی از شرکت‌ها برای ایجاد عملکرد را گوشزد می‌کند و آن را سیاستی منجر به هدررفت منابع می داند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Comparing the mediating effect of governmental and non-governmental support on the performance of knowledge-based companies in the field of ICT

نویسندگان English

Maryam seyfikar 1
Ehsan Chitsaz 2
Yahya Palizdar 3
1 MA in Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran
2 Faculty member, school of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran
3 Faculty member of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Research Institute; Visiting professor, school of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran
چکیده English

The knowledge-based economy is known as the engine of countries' development, For this reason, many countries have been investing in advanced technologies such as biotechnology, Internet of Things, industrial data, blockchain, artificial intelligence and etc. as well as emerging innovations for many years for technological excellence. Iran is not an exception to this policy and has considered the development of a knowledge-based economy as the way out of the long-term economic stagnation of the years of sanctions. The purpose of this article is to analyze and investigate the mediating effect of government and non-government financial support on the performance of knowledge-based companies in the field of ICT
The present research is quantitative in terms of data and research method. The necessary data for the test of 6 hypotheses in this research were received and analyzed from the Innovation and Prosperity Fund and the Scientific Vice President. The knowledge-based companies in the sample of this research include 1002 companies out of a total of 1667 knowledge-based companies that have managed to obtain a knowledge-based title on at least one of their products (goods or services) by the end of September 1401. Linear regression method and Warp PLS 8 software were used to test the hypotheses.
The results of this research show that despite the efforts made to support knowledge-based companies, these supports have not had a significant effect on the performance of companies, and the performance of companies is often based on the resource-oriented theory of the organization's internal resources.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Investment
company
performance
knowledge-based
resource based view
ICT companies
سلطانی، علی‌محمد، طباطباییان، سید حبیب‌الله. (2019). ارزیابی سیاست‌های علم، فناوری و نوآوری. سیاست علم و فناوری، 12(2)، 561-578.
شجاعی، سید محمدحسین، شجاعتی، خالدی، آرمان. (2021). تحلیلی تاریخی بر شکل‌گیری و توسعه تجربه سیاستی قانون حمایت از شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان. بهبود مدیریت، 15(3)، 63-90.‎
شهمرادی، غلامعلی، ترابی، تقی، رادفر، رضا، چراغعلی، محمدحسن. (1402). بررسی سطوح پیچیدگی فناورانه‌ی فعالیت‌های تحقیق و توسعه در شرکت-های دانش‌بنیان مستقر در پارک علم و فناوری گلستان. فصلنامه توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی، 22(55)، 53-66.
doi: 10.22034/jtd.2023.706286
عظیمی، حسین، حسین پور، عطریه. (1402). تاثیر بازارگرایی بر عملکرد سازمانی با نقش میانجی یادگیری‌گرایی (مطالعه موردی: شرکت‌های پگاه، مخابرات و پارس‌سوئیچ). فصلنامه توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی، 21(51)، 3-14.
doi: 10.22034/jtd.2022.254484
 محمدی الیاسی، قنبر، چیت ساز، احسان، گرامی، عباس. (1389). شناسایی عوامل درون سازمانی موثر بر عملکرد شرکت‌های نوپا. نشریه اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، شماره، 21-22.
Abdurakhmonov, M., Ridge, J. W., & Hill, A. D. (2021). Unpacking firm external dependence: How government contract dependence affects firm investments and market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 327-350.
Acs, Z. J., et al. (1997). Small firm entry in US manufacturing. Economica, 64(255), 485-499.
Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023). Green human resource management and environmental performance: The role of green innovation and environmental strategy in a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1782-1798.
Almus, M. & Nerlinger, E. A. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141-154.
Aleksandrovich-Adamenko, A., & Viktorovna-Koneva, M. (2022). Creating efficient accounting for construction organizations utilizing key performance indicators. Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío.
Atkinson, R. D., & Lind, M. (2018). Big is beautiful: Debunking the myth of small business. MIT Press
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research policy, 34(7), 1113-1122.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Birkinshaw, J. U. L. I. A. N., & Fey, C. F. (2001). External sources of knowledge and performance in R&D organizations. Strategic and International Management.
Bocken, N. M. (2015). Sustainable venture capital–catalyst for sustainable start-up success? Journal of cleaner production, 108, 647-658.
Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & De Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(3), 227-236.
Bustinza, O. F., Gomes, E., Vendrell‐Herrero, F., & Baines, T. (2019). Product–service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity. R&d Management, 49(1), 33-45.
Chitsaz, E., Liang, D., & Khoshsoroor, S. (2017). The impact of resource configuration on Iranian technology venture performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 186-195.
Chuang, K. S. (2020). Private placements, market discounts and firm performance: the perspective of corporate life cycle analysis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54, 541-564.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2013). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research policy, 42(1), 76-89.
Datta, A. (2023). A Resource Configuration Perspective to Examine Strategic Renewal: A Study of Movie Franchises. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2023, No. 1, p. 12597). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Dedrick .J , Kraemer .K & Shih .E (2013) Information Technology and Productivity in Developed and Developing Countries, Journal of Management Information Systems, 30:1, 97-122, DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300103
Dorinela, C. (2011). Knowledge Based Company–a Theoretical Approach. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series. Ovidius University of Constantza. Faculty of Economic Sciences, 0 (2), 307-310.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Blome, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2019). Big data and predictive analytics and manufacturing performance: integrating institutional theory, resource‐based view and big data culture. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 341-361.
El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological forecasting and social change, 144, 483-498.
Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of economic perspectives, 15(2), 145-168.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609-639). North-Holland.
Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35-51.
Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2011). Who creates jobs? Small vs. large vs. young. NBER working paper, 16300.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American journal of sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
Hashai, N., & Zahra, S. (2022). Founder team prior work experience: An asset or a liability for startup growth?. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(1), 155-184.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate behavioral research, 45(4), 627-660.
Hidayat, M. F., & Achmad, R. F. A. (2019). Estimation of Truncated Spline Function in Non-parametric Path Analysis Based on Weighted Least Square (WLS). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
Kirjazovaitė, G. (2022). Key performance indicators for start-ups in furniture industry (Doctoral dissertation, Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas).
Klette, T. J., et al. (2000). Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. Journal of Political Economy, 108(5), 986-1018.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin
Kock, N. (2014). Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 10(1), 1-13.
Kock, N. (2015). PLS-based SEM algorithms: The good neighbor assumption, collinearity, and nonlinearity. Information Management and Business Review, 7(2), 113-130.
Kuppusamy, M., Raman, M. and Lee, G. (2009), Whose ICT Investment Matters to Economic Growth: Private or Public? The Malaysian Perspective. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00262.x
Li, H. (2001). How does new venture strategy matter in the environment–performance relationship? The journal of high technology management research, 12(2), 183-204.
Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures. Strategic management journal, 22(6‐7), 615-640.
Lee, R., Lee, J. H., & Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507-515.
Lerner, J. (2002). When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: the design of effectivepublic venture capital'programmes. The economic journal, 112(477), F73-F84.
Lundvall, B. A. (1992). Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. New York: Pinter.
Lozhkina, S., Abaev, A., Borovikova, T., Zelenkina, E., & Gorbatkova, G. (2021). Determination of the effectiveness of investments in ICT using a combination of functional and resource assessment criteria. ABAC Journal, 41(4), 24-42.
Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2004). Patterns of entry, post-entry growth and survival: a comparison between domestic and foreign owned firms. Small Business Economics, 22(3), 283-298.
Mata, J., Portugal, P., & Guimaraes, P. (1995). The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International journal of industrial organization, 13(4), 459-481.
Moqbel, M., Guduru, R., & Harun, A. (2020). Testing mediation via indirect effects in PLS-SEM: A social networking site illustration. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 1(3).
Mowery, D. and Sampath, B. (2004). “The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for other OECD Governments?” In D. Mowery et al. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh Dole Act. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Murphy, M., Danis, W. M., & Mack, J. (2020). From principles to action: Community-based entrepreneurship in the Toquaht Nation. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 106051.
Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?. Strategic management journal, 12(S2), 61-74.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Ngwenyama .O & Morawczynski .O (2009) Factors affecting ICT expansion in emerging economies: An analysis of ICT infrastructure expansion in five Latin American countries, Information Technology for Development, 15:4, 237-258, DOI: 10.1002/itdj.20128
Nitoslawski, S. A., Galle, N. J., Van Den Bosch, C. K., & Steenberg, J. W. (2019). Smarter ecosystems for smarter cities? A review of trends, technologies, and turning points for smart urban forestry. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101770.
Papa, A., Dezi, L., Gregori, G. L., Mueller, J., & Miglietta, N. (2020). Improving innovation performance through knowledge acquisition: the moderating role of employee retention and human resource management practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(3), 589-605.
Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press.
Radas, S., Anić, I.-D., Tafro, A., & Wagner, V. (2015). The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises. Technovation, 38, 15-30.
Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L. P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 271-280.
Robinson, K. C., & Phillips McDougall, P. (2001). Entry barriers and new venture performance: a comparison of universal and contingency approaches. Strategic management journal, 22(6‐7), 659-685.
Rojas, F., & Huergo, E. (2016). Characteristics of entrepreneurs and public support for NTBFs. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 363-382.
Sands, D., & MacElroy, G. (2006). Asset management KPIs, validated, analysed and predicted utilising self learning hybrid modelling in real time. In Engineering Asset Management: Proceedings of the 1 st World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM) 11–14 July 2006 (pp. 757-766). Springer London.
Saka-Helmhout, A., Chappin, M., & Vermeulen, P. (2020). Multiple paths to firm innovation in sub-Saharan Africa: How informal institutions matter. Organization studies, 41(11), 1551-1575.
Santisteban, J., Mauricio, D., & Cachay, O. (2021). Critical success factors for technology-based startups. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 42(4), 397-421.
Scarborough, N. M., & Zimmerer, T. W. (1996b). Effective small business management: An entrepreneurial approach.
shahmoradi, G. , torabi, T. , radfar, R. and cheraghali, M. (2024). Investigating the levels of technological complexity of research and development activities in knowledge-based companies located in Golestan Science and Technology Park. Quarterly journal of Industrial Technology Development, 22(55), 53-66. doi: 10.22034/jtd.2024.711435
Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141-149.
Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological forecasting and social change, 150, 119762.
Solimun, A., Fernandes, N., & Nurjannah, N. (2017). Metode Statistika Multivariat Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural (SEM). Malang: Penerbit UB Press Series Di Kota Palu, 2(7), 34-46.
Stam (2015) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique, European Planning Studies, 23:9, 1759-1769, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
Tajeddini, K., Martin, E., & Altinay, L. (2020). The importance of human-related factors on service innovation and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, 102431.
Teece, D. J., et al. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., & Bosma, N. (2005). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 24(4), 365-380.
Vu, T. H., Nguyen, V. D., Ho, M. T., & Vuong, Q. H. (2019). Determinants of Vietnamese listed firm performance: Competition, wage, CEO, firm size, age, and international trade. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(2), 62.
Wadongo, B. and Abdel-Kader, M. (2014), “Contingency theory, performance management and organizational effectiveness in the third sector: a theoretical framework”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63 No. 6, pp. 680-703
Wardhani, N., Nugroho, W., Fernandes, A., & Solimun, S. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Analysis with Warppls Approach Based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Mathematics and Statistics, 8(3), 311-322.
Yli-Renko, H., Denoo, L., & Janakiraman, R. (2020). A knowledge-based view of managing dependence on a key customer: Survival and growth outcomes for young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 106045.
Zahra, S. A., Matherne, B. P., & Carleton, J. M. (2023). Technological resource leveraging and the internationalisation of new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 163-186.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zhang, J., Zhang, W., & Schwab, A. (2024). Interorganizational triads for foreign-market entry: Partnerships among Western, bridge-economy, and local VCs in mainland China. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(1), 10636.

  • تاریخ دریافت 21 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 08 اسفند 1402