توسعه چارچوب ارزیابی و گزینش پلتفرم‌های غیرمتمرکز و خصوصی مبتنی بر بلاکچین

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، ایران

10.22034/jtd.2026.1987364.1823
چکیده
گستردگی و اهمیت اقتصاد دیجیتال در جهانی که به طور فزاینده از خلق و کاربرد نوآوری‌های نوظهور استقبال می‌کند، بر کسی پوشیده نیست. در حال حاضر، اقتصاد دیجیتال، اشکال متداول مبادلات تجاری و شیوه‌های عمل و تعامل سازمانی را دستخوش تغییر کرده است و چرخه تکامل آن با پیشرفت در چندین فناوری مرزی و تحول‌آفرین مانند بلاکچین، هنوز در مسیر توسعه خود قرار دارد. نسل جدید بلاکچین با پتانسیل به کارگیری در حوزه‌های تجاری و صنایع عمومی به زدودن ساختارهای سازمانی غیر‌ شفاف، زائد و اغلب محافظت نشده می‌انجامد. با این حال، پیاده‌سازی بلاکچین خصوصی نیازمند تصمیم‌گیری درست کنسرسیوم‌ها و سازمان‌ها در انتخاب ارائه‌دهندگان سرویس است. از این رو، هدف مطالعه حاضر، ارائه یک فرایند تصمیم‌گیری برای ارزیابی و گزینش پلتفرم‌های بلاکچین در کاربردهای سازمانی است. برای دستیابی به هدف مطالعاتی مذکور، فرایندی سه مرحله‌ای شامل استخراج معیارهای تاثیرگذار بر ارزیابی بلاکچین‌های خصوصی، تعیین میزان اهمیت و وزن مولفه‌های شناسایی شده و تحلیل مقایسه‌ای گزینه‌های پیش‌روی سازمان در پیاده‌سازی بلاکچین مناسب کسب‌و‌کار، انجام می‌گردد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از آن است که 9 معیار امنیت (با ضریب اهمیت 0/16)، تحمل خطا (0/14)، اجماع (0/13)، مقیاس ‌پذیری (0/12)، سازگاری و تعامل (0/11)، عوامل هزینه‌ای (0/11)، جنبه‌های عملکردی (0/10)، سهولت استفاده (0/08) و محبوبیت (0/03)، از ضروری‌ترین فاکتورها در ارزیابی بلاکچین‌های خصوصی و مجوز‌دار به شمار می‌روند. همچنین، نتایج حاصل از مقایسه پلتفرم‌های بلاکچین خصوصی نشان می‌دهند که هایپرلجر فابریک متداول‌ترین پلتفرمی است که توسط سازمان‌ها پذیرفته می‌شود و از نظر معیارهای مورد مطالعه، در جایگاه متمایزی نسبت به دیگر رقبای خود و سایر پلتفرم‌های مشابه قرار دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Providing a Framework for Evaluating and Selecting Decentralized and Private Blockchain-Based Platforms

نویسندگان English

Fatemeh Askari 1
maryam nekooeezade 2
1 Department of Management, Shiraz University
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Iran
چکیده English

The extent and importance of the digital economy in a world that increasingly welcomes the creation and application of emerging innovations is not hidden from anyone. Currently, the digital economy has changed the common forms of business actions and the ways of functioning and interacting with organizations, and its evolution cycle is still on its development path with the development of several transformative technologies such as blockchain. The new generation of blockchain with the potential to be used in commercial and public industries leads to the elimination of opaque, redundant, and often unprotected organizational structures. However, the implementation of private blockchain requires correct decisions of consortia and organizations in the selection of service providers. Hence, the present study aims to provide a decision-making process for the evaluation and selection of blockchain platforms in enterprise applications. To achieve the goal, a three-step process including extracting effective criteria for evaluating private blockchains, determining the importance and weight of the identified components, and Comparative analysis of organization options have been performed. The research findings show that 9 measures of security (with an importance coefficient of 0.16), fault tolerance (0.14), consensus algorithms (0.13), scalability (0.12), compatibility and interaction (0.11), cost factors (0.11), performance (0.10), ease of use (0.08), and popularity (0.03), are the most essential factors in evaluating private and permissioned blockchains. Also, the results of the comparison of private blockchain platforms show that Hyperledger Fabric is the most common platform used by organizations and is in a distinct position compared to competitors and other similar platforms.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Blockchain,,;,
Disruptive Innovation,,;,
Distributed Ledger,,;,
Peer-to-Peer network,,;,
Consensus Mechanism,,;,
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Alazab, M., Alhyari, S., Awajan, A., & Abdallah, A. B. (2021). Blockchain technology in supply chain management: An empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance. Cluster Computing, 24(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03200-4
Almeshal, T. A., & Alhogail, A. A. (2021). Blockchain for businesses: A scoping review of suitability evaluations frameworks. IEEE Access, 9, 137452-137464. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3128608
Ante, L., Sandner, P., & Fiedler, I. (2018). Blockchain-based ICOs: Pure hype or the dawn of a new era of startup financing? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(4), 80. https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/11/4/80
Aste, T., Tasca, P., & Di Matteo, T. (2017). Blockchain technologies: The foreseeable impact on society and industry. Computer, 50(9), 18-28.
Bashir, I. (2017). Mastering blockchain. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Belchior, R., Vasconcelos, A., Guerreiro, S., & Correia, M. (2021). A survey on blockchain interoperability: Past, present, and future trends. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(8), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471140
Berson, A. (1996). Client/server architecture. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Beygelzimer, A., Kephart, J., & Rish, I. (2007). Evaluation of optimization methods for network bottleneck diagnosis. In Fourth International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’07) (pp. 20-20). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2007.15
Burgess, K., & Colangelo, J. (2015). The promise of bitcoin and the blockchain. Consumers’ Research.
Büyüközkan, G., & Tüfekçi, G. (2021). A decision-making framework for evaluating appropriate business blockchain platforms using multiple preference formats and VIKOR. Information Sciences, 571, 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.044
Cachin, C., & Vukolić, M. (2017). Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild (arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.01873
Chaudhry, N., & Yousaf, M. M. (2018). Consensus algorithms in blockchain: Comparative analysis, challenges and opportunities. In 2018 12th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST) (pp. 54-63). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSST.2018.8632190
Chazhaeva, M. M., Serebryakova, A. A., Tashkulova, G. K., & Atabekova, N. K. (2019). Sustainable development of the digital economy on the basis of managing social and technological threats. In Institute of Scientific Communications Conference (pp. 49-56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29586-8_6
Chi, L., & Zhu, X. (2017). Hashing techniques: A survey and taxonomy. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047307
Clifford, F., & Logan, P. (2018). The role of fault tolerance for blockchain.
Croman, K., et al. (2016). On scaling decentralized blockchains. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 106-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53357-4_8
Dabbagh, M., Choo, K.-K. R., Beheshti, A., Tahir, M., & Safa, N. S. (2021). A survey of empirical performance evaluation of permissioned blockchain platforms: Challenges and opportunities. Computers & Security, 100, 102078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.102078
Damgard, I. B. (1989). A design principle for hash functions. In Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34805-0_39
Hamida, E. B., Brousmiche, K. L., Levard, H., & Thea, E. (2017). Blockchain for enterprise: Overview, opportunities and challenges. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC 2017).
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Springer.
Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Radeva, I., & Popchev, I. (2021). Blockchain software selection as a fuzzy multi-criteria problem. Computers, 10(10), 120. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/10/10/120#
Karayazi, F., & Bereketli, I. (2020). Criteria weighting for blockchain software selection using fuzzy AHP. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 608-615). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_70
Kuo, T.-T., Zavaleta Rojas, H., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2019). Comparison of blockchain platforms: A systematic review and healthcare examples. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(5), 462-478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy185
Lai, H., & Liao, H. (2021). A multi-criteria decision making method based on DNMA and CRITIC with linguistic D numbers for blockchain platform evaluation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 101, 104200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104200
Li, W., Sforzin, A., Fedorov, S., & Karame, G. O. (2017). Towards scalable and private industrial blockchains. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Contracts (pp. 9-14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3055518.3055531
Lou, A. T., & Li, E. Y. (2017). Integrating innovation diffusion theory and the technology acceptance model: The adoption of blockchain technology from business managers’ perspective.
Mainelli, M., & Smith, M. (2015). Sharing ledgers for sharing economies: An exploration of mutual distributed ledgers (aka blockchain technology). Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3).
Maly, R. J., Mischke, J., Kurtansky, P., & Stiller, B. (2003). Comparison of centralized (client-server) and decentralized (peer-to-peer) networking [Semester thesis, ETH Zurich].
McDaniel, C. A., & Norberg, H. C. (2019). Can blockchain technology facilitate international trade? Mercatus Research Paper.
Min, H. (2019). Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.012
Mingxiao, D., Xiaofeng, M., Zhe, Z., Xiangwei, W., & Qijun, C. (2017). A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 2567-2572). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8123011
Monrat, A. A., Schelén, O., & Andersson, K. (2020). Performance evaluation of permissioned blockchain platforms. In 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Morkunas, V. J., Paschen, J., & Boon, E. (2019). How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Business Horizons, 62(3), 295-306.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, 21260.
Nanayakkara, S., Rodrigo, M., Perera, S., Weerasuriya, G. T., & Hijazi, A. A. (2021). A methodology for selection of a blockchain platform to develop an enterprise system. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 23, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100215
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
Narayanan, A., & Clark, J. (2017). Bitcoin’s academic pedigree. Communications of the ACM, 60(12), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132259
Nguyen, G.-T., & Kim, K. (2018). A survey about consensus algorithms used in blockchain. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 14(1), 101-128. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.01.0024
Oliveira, M. T., et al. (2019). Towards a performance evaluation of private blockchain frameworks using a realistic workload. In 2019 22nd Conference on Innovation in Clouds, Internet and Networks and Workshops (ICIN) (pp. 180-187). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIN.2019.8685888
Pahlajani, S., Kshirsagar, A., & Pachghare, V. (2019). Survey on private blockchain consensus algorithms. In 2019 1st International Conference on Innovations in Information and Communication Technology (ICIICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIICT1.2019.8741353
Patsch, R. (2020). Survey on Hyperledger Fabric and comparison of Blockchain as a Service Providers [PhD thesis, University of Applied Sciences].
Podgorelec, B., Keršič, V., & Turkanović, M. (2019). Analysis of fault tolerance in permissioned blockchain networks. In 2019 XXVII International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAT47117.2019.8938836
Popkova, E. G., & Sergi, B. S. (2020). Digital economy: Complexity and variety vs. rationality.
Preneel, B. (1994). Cryptographic hash functions. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 5(4), 431-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4460050406
Quasim, M. T., Khan, M. A., Algarni, F., Alharthy, A., & Alshmrani, G. M. M. (2020). Blockchain frameworks. In Decentralised internet of things (pp. 75-89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38677-1_4
Raman, R., & Raj, B. E. (2021). The world of NFTs (non-fungible tokens): The future of blockchain and asset ownership. In Enabling blockchain technology for secure networking and communications (pp. 89-108). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5839-3.ch005
Rauchs, M., Blandin, A., Bear, K., & McKeon, S. B. (2019). 2nd global enterprise blockchain benchmarking study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3461765
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.
Schollmeier, R. (2001). A definition of peer-to-peer networking for the classification of peer-to-peer architectures and applications. In Proceedings First International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (pp. 101-102). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/P2P.2001.990434
Soni, S., & Bhushan, B. (2019). A comprehensive survey on blockchain: Working, security analysis, privacy threats and potential applications. In 2019 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT) (Vol. 1, pp. 922-926). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICICT46008.2019.8993210
Stifter, N., Judmayer, A., & Weippl, E. (2019). Revisiting practical byzantine fault tolerance through blockchain technologies. In Security and Quality in Cyber-Physical Systems Engineering (pp. 471-495). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25312-7_17
Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Tan, W. K. A., & Sundarakani, B. (2020). Assessing blockchain technology application for freight booking business: A case study from Technology Acceptance Model perspective. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 13(3), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-04-2020-0018
Thanh, N. V. (2022). Blockchain development services provider assessment model for a logistics organizations. Processes, 10(6), 1209.
Udokwu, C., Kormiltsyn, A., Thangalimodzi, K., & Norta, A. (2018). The state of the art for blockchain-enabled smart-contract applications in the organization. In 2018 Ivannikov Ispras Open Conference (ISPRAS) (pp. 137-144). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPRAS.2018.00029
Ullah, I., Kanhere, S. S., & Boreli, R. (2020). Privacy-preserving targeted mobile advertising: A blockchain-based framework for mobile ads (arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.10479). https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.12845717.v1
Viriyasitavat, W., & Hoonsopon, D. (2019). Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 13, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.07.004
Wang, Y., Zhao, Q., & Zheng, D. (2005). Bottlenecks in production networks: An overview. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(3), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0198-3
Xu, M., Chen, X., & Kou, G. (2019). A systematic review of blockchain. Financial Innovation, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-019-0147-z
Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N., & Scarfone, K. (2019). Blockchain technology overview (arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11078). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.11078
Yang, B., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2002). Improving search in peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (pp. 5-14). IEEE.
Yang, R., et al. (2020). Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration. Automation in Construction, 118, 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103276
Yang, W., Garg, S., Huang, Z., & Kang, B. (2021). A decision model for blockchain applicability into knowledge-based conversation system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 220, 106791.
Zhang, R., Xue, R., & Liu, L. (2019). Security and privacy on blockchain. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316481
Zhao, W. (2021). From traditional fault tolerance to blockchain. John Wiley & Sons.
Zhou, Q., Huang, H., Zheng, Z., & Bian, J. (2020). Solutions to scalability of blockchain: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 16440-16455. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967218
دوره 24، شماره 63
بهار 1405
صفحه 15-28

  • تاریخ دریافت 22 دی 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 بهمن 1403