ارزیابی وضعیت بلوغ سرمایه فکری در کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان غرب کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

10.22034/jtd.2026.737051
چکیده
سرمایه فکری، به عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین دارایی‌های نامشهود، نقش کلیدی در موفقیت و بقای کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان ایفا می‌کند. ارزیابی و مدیریت بلوغ سرمایه فکری، سازمان‌ها را در جهت توسعه و بهره‌برداری بهینه از این دارایی ارزشمند یاری می‌رساند. این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی وضعیت بلوغ سرمایه فکری در کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان غرب کشور انجام شده است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری داده‌ها توصیفی-پیمایشی و از حیث شیوه اجرا، پژوهشی کمی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان مستقر در شهرک‌های صنعتی غرب کشور می‌باشد که ۲۱۲ شرکت به صورت نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای به نسبت دسته فناوری این شرکت‌ها با روش کوکران به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده در این پژوهش پرسشنامه استاندارد بر اساس مدل بلوغ سرمایه فکری (ICMM) واز و همکاران (۲۰۱۸) است که ابعاد اصلی سرمایه انسانی، سرمایه ساختاری و سرمایه رابطه‌ای را با ۲۱ شاخص مورد ارزیابی قرار می‌دهد. پایایی پرسشنامه برای ابعاد سرمایه انسانی، سرمایه ساختاری و سرمایه رابطه‌ای با استفاده از روش آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب ۸۹ درصد، ۸۴ درصد و ۸۷ درصد محاسبه شده است. داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از میانگین، آزمون t، آنالیز واریانس و همبستگی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن بود که متوسط سطح بلوغ سرمایه فکری در کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان غرب کشور بر روی سطح اول بلوغ سرمایه فکری، یعنی سطح «آغازین» قرار دارد. همچنین، بررسی ابعاد بلوغ سرمایه فکری مشخص می‌کند که به ترتیب ابعاد سرمایه ساختاری، سرمایه انسانی و سرمایه رابطه‌ای در این شرکت‌ها وضعیت بهتری دارند. بین ابعاد سه‌گانه سرمایه فکری (سرمایه انسانی، سرمایه ساختاری و سرمایه رابطه‌ای) و وضعیت بلوغ سرمایه فکری رابطه معناداری مشاهده شد. با توجه به یافته‌های پژوهش، کسب‌وکارهای دانش‌بنیان غرب کشور نیازمند توجه بیشتر به مدیریت و توسعه سرمایه فکری خود هستند. سرمایه‌گذاری در آموزش و توانمندسازی کارکنان، ایجاد و توسعه زیرساخت‌های دانش، و بهبود فرآیندهای سازمانی می‌تواند به ارتقای سطح بلوغ سرمایه فکری و در نتیجه، افزایش رقابت‌پذیری این کسب‌وکارها منجر شود. همچنین، این پژوهش با ارائه تصویری دقیق از وضعیت بلوغ سرمایه فکری در منطقه، می‌تواند به عنوان مبنایی برای سیاست‌گذاری‌ها و برنامه‌ریزی‌های آتی در جهت توسعه اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the Intellectual Capital Maturity Level in Knowledge-Based Businesses in the West of the Iran

نویسندگان English

Hossein Azizinejad 1
Gholamreza Tavakoli 2
Mohammad Ehsanifar 3
Amir Najafi 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Intellectual capital, as one of the most important intangible assets, plays a key role in the success and survival of knowledge-based businesses. Assessing and managing intellectual capital maturity helps organizations develop and optimally utilize this valuable asset. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing the maturity status of intellectual capital in knowledge-based businesses in the west of the country. This study is applied in terms of its purpose, descriptive-survey in terms of data collection, and quantitative in terms of its implementation method. The statistical population of this study includes all knowledge-based companies located in industrial towns in the west of the country, of which 212 companies were selected as samples by stratified random sampling based on the technology category of these companies using the Cochran method. The data collection tool in this study is a standard questionnaire based on the Intellectual Capital Maturity Model (ICMM) by Vaz et al. (2018), which evaluates the main dimensions of human capital, structural capital, and relational capital with 21 indicators. The reliability of the questionnaire for the dimensions of human capital, structural capital and relational capital was calculated using Cronbach's alpha method as 89%, 84% and 87% respectively. The research data were evaluated using the mean, t-test, analysis of variance and correlation. The results of the research showed that the average level of intellectual capital maturity in knowledge-based businesses in the west of the country is at the first level of intellectual capital maturity, that is, the "beginning" level. Also, examining the dimensions of intellectual capital maturity shows that the dimensions of structural capital, human capital and relational capital are in a better position in these companies, respectively. A significant relationship was observed between the three dimensions of intellectual capital (human capital, structural capital and relational capital) and the maturity status of intellectual capital. According to the research findings, knowledge-based businesses in the west of the country need to pay more attention to the management and development of their intellectual capital. Investing in training and empowering employees, creating and developing knowledge infrastructures, and improving organizational processes can lead to improving the level of intellectual capital maturity and, as a result, increasing the competitiveness of these businesses. Also, this research, by providing an accurate picture of the state of intellectual capital maturity in the region, can be used as a basis for future policies and planning to develop the knowledge-based economy.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Intellectual capital
intellectual capital maturity
knowledge-based businesses
industrial parks
Becker, G. S. (1962). Human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9-49. https://doi.org/10.1086/258724
Bontis, N. (2002). Intellectual capital disclosure in Canadian corporations. Journal of Human Costing and Accounting, 3 (3), 9- 20. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb029076
Bratianu, C., & Pînzaru, F. (2015). Challenges for the university intellectual capital in the knowledge economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 609–627.     https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:3:y:2015:i:4:p:609-627
Bukh, P. N., Larsen, H. T., & Mouritsen, J. (2001). Constructing intellectual capital statements. Scandinavian journal of management, 17(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(00)00034-8
Dumay, J., & Garanina, T. (2013). Intellectual capital research: A critical examination of the third stage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931311288995
Francioli, F., & Albanese, M. (2017), The evaluation of core competencies in networks: the network competence report, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2016-0014
Hadidane, S., & Lamraoui, Z. (2022). Intellectual Capital: Concepts, Characteristics and Classifications. Afak For Sciences, 7(2), 1-10. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/181678
Hitt, M.A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. & Kochhar, R. (2001), Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 13-28. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069334
Hughes, J. (1988). The philosophy of intellectual property. Geo. LJ, 77, 287.
Kaufmann, L., & Schneider, Y. (2004). Intangibles: A synthesis of current research. Journal of intellectual capital, 5(3), 366-388. doi.org/10.1108/14691930410550354
Kerzner, H. (2001), Strategic Planning for Project Management using a Project Maturity Model, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, p. 352. http://diglib.globalcollege.edu.et:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1611/08792.pdf
León, H.C.M., & Ferris, J.A. (2011), Lean product development research: current state and future directions, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011.11431885
Lepak, D.P. & Snell, S.A. (1999). The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 31-48.
Liker, J., & Morgan, J. (2011), Lean product development as a system: a case study of body and stamping development at ford, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011.11431884
Ling, Y.H. (2013), The influence of intellectual capital on organizational performance-knowledge management as moderator, Asia Pacific Journal Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 937-964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9257-5
Malikah, A., & Nandiroh, U. (2024). Intellectual Capital and Value of the Firm: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(4). DOI:10.55227/ijhess.v3i4.777
Marr.B.(2005). Perspectives on intellectual capital. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann. Oxford.
McGregor, J., Tweed, D. and Pech, R. (2004), Human capital in the new economy: devil’s bargain?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410512978
Namasivayam, K., & Denizci, B. (2006), Human capital in service organizations: identifying value drivers, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930610681465
Petrash, G. (1996). Dow's journey to a knowledge value management culture. European management journal, 14(4), 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(96)00023-0
Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010348731
Prado, D.S. (2010), Maturidade em Gerenciamento de Projetos, INDG Tecnologia e Serviços Ltda., Nova Lima.
Rabechini, R. Jr .(2003), A Estruturação de Competências e Maturidade em Gerenciamento de Projetos, Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção), Escola Politécnica da USP, São Paulo. http://www.fundacaofia.com.br/pgtusp/eventos/seminarios/texto_roque.pdf
Ramírez, Y., & Gordillo, S. (2013). Recognition of intellectual capital importance in the university sector. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3(4), 27–41. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lrc:larijb:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:27-41
Ramirez, Y., Tejada, A., & Manzaneque, M. (2016). The value of disclosing intellectual capital in Spanish universities: A new challenge of our days. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2015-0025
Rastogi, P. N. (2003). The nature and role of IC: Rethinking the process of value creation and sustained enterprise growth. Journal of intellectual capital, 4(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310472848
Ren, J.Y. (2009). The empirical study on the relationship between corporate intellectual capital and corporate performance. IE and EM 2009 - Proceedings 2009 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2054–2058. DOI: 10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344238
Rodrigues, & Paulo Mauricio Selig. (2016). Maturity assessment model of intellectual capital for manufacturing organization. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14(1), 206-219.‏ DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7430081
Santos, A., & Cincera, M. (2022). Determinants of financing constraints. Small Business Economics, 58(3), 1427-1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00449-w
Sanchez Limon, M. L., Sanchez Tovar, Y., & Jasso Villazul, J. (2021). Caracterización del capital intelectual en las universidades publicas. Estudio comparativo. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 6(1), e203. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2021.v6i1.203
Secundo, G., Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Bagnoli, C. (2018). Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: A critical case study in university settings. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2016-0113
Secundo, G., Elena-Perez, S., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. H. (2015). An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: A dynamic approach. Journal of intellectual Capital, Vol. 16, no 2, pp 419 – 442. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2014-0072
Seleim, A., Ashour, A. & Bontis, N. (2004), Intellectual capital in Egyptian software firms, The Learning Organization, Vol. 11 Nos 4-5, pp. 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470410538233
Semenov, V. (2016). Institutional features of strategic management of intellectual capital reproduction. 2015 4th Forum Strategic Partnership of Universities and Enterprises of Hi-Tech Branches (Science. Education. Innovation), 52-54. DOI: 10.1109/IVForum.2015.7388251
So, M., & Ratnatunga, J. (2020). A Normative Approach to Valuation, Value Enhancement and Financial Statement Reporting of Intellectual Capital. Management Accounting Frontiers, 3, 25 52. https://ontarget.cmaaustralia.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/MAF-Vol.-3-So.pdf
Stewart, T.A., & Stephanie, L. (1994), Your company’s most valuable asset: intellectual capital, Fortune, Vol. 130 No. 7, pp. 68-74.
Todericiu, R., & Stanit, A. (2016). Universities intellectual capital. Management and Economics, 4(84), 348–356.
Vaz, C. R., Paulo, M. S., & Claudia, V. V, (2018). A proposal of intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) evaluation, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp 208-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0130
 
References (In Persian)
Abdoli, M. R., Kordi, E., & Valian, H. (2023). Assessing the maturity of intellectual capital based on the themes of mutual learning linkage in knowledge-based companies in the oil and gas sector, Scientific Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 14(48): 227-270. DOR: 20.1001.1.82548002.1401.14.2.4.7
Bani Asadi, M. (2024). Designing and compiling a model for the development of intellectual capital in the government services sector with a maturity assessment approach, PhD thesis in management, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.82548002.1400.13.4.7.7
Fakhari, H. (2021). Investigating the problems of providing capital in the process of commercializing knowledge-based products. Science and Technology Policy, 14(1), 3-20. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1400.14.1.1.8
Ghasemi, F., Daneshfard, K., Najafbeigi, R., & Afshar Kazemi, M. A. (2019). Designing a native model for measuring intellectual capital with a pathological approach in the Ministry of Oil, Scientific-Research Journal of Human Resource Management in the Oil Industry, 11(44): 211-238. http://iieshrm.ir/article-1-895-fa.html
Ghasemi, F., Daneshfard, K., Najafbeigi, R., & Afshar Kazemi, M. A. (2019). Designing a native model for measuring intellectual capital with a pathological approach in the Ministry of Oil, Scientific-Research Journal of Human Resource Management in the Oil Industry, 11(44): 211-238. http://iieshrm.ir/article-1-895-fa.html
Jafari, A., & Sayah Rafiei, S. (2021). Law of knowledge-based companies. Tehran: Majd Publications.
Khadivar, A., & Abbasi, F. (2016). Assessment of knowledge management maturity in the top three hundred Iranian companies. Modern Research in Decision Making, 1(3), 23-42.
Khayatian, M. S., Elyassi, M., & Tabatabaian, H. (2016). Sustainability model of knowledge-based companies in Iran, Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Science and Technology Policy, No. 2, 49-62. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1395.9.2.5.9
Khameneh, A. H., & Vahedi-Diz, A. (2008). Comparative comparison between project management maturity models and selection of the optimal model for application in companies with a general contracting structure, International Conference on Strategic Project Management, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/43788/
Kurdi, E. (2024). Designing an Intellectual Capital Maturity Model (ICMM) for Capital Market Companies in order to Develop Sustainable Corporate Functions, PhD Thesis in Accounting, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch. DOR: 20.1001.1.82548002.1401.14.2.4.7
Nejat, S. A. R., Biglar, M., & Kashian, S. B. (2023). Assessing the Maturity Status of Intellectual Capital in the Field of Management and Planning of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Payavard Salamat Journal, 16(1): 71-80. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17358132.1401.16.1.6.3
Nejat, S. A. R., & Karimi Khozani, A. (2019). Assessing the Maturity Level of Intellectual Capital Management in NAJA Research and Studies, Quarterly Journal of Resource Management in the Police Force, 8(2): 155-180.
Saghafi, A., & Mirzaei Abbas Abad, M. M. (2022). Model for measuring and reporting intellectual capital in Iran, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Accounting Research, 12(45): 26-3. 10.22051/jera.2021.36265.286
Salmani, D., Piran-Nejad, A., Farhangi, A. A. ., & Mandegari, M. A. (2019). Development and explanation of the intellectual capital maturity model in Iranian universities, Management in Islamic University, 8(2): 247-260.
دوره 24، شماره 64
تابستان 1405
صفحه 55-74

  • تاریخ دریافت 30 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 14 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 مرداد 1404